In short: Quote a laser job from machine time, not part area: machine time × shop rate, plus material, plus setup.
Machine time is cutting, piercing and rapid moves, taken from the nested file. A part with many small holes can take far longer than its cut length suggests, so per-metre pricing often loses money. Calibrate by timing a known part.
The formula
Job cost = (machine time × shop rate) + (material × markup) + setup + admin
Machine time = cut time + pierce time + rapid-move time
Cut time (min) = cut length (m) ÷ cutting speed (m/min)
Pierce time (s) = pierces × seconds per pierce
The Fabricator gives the same core formula for laser run time: inches of cut divided by cutting speed, plus pierces times pierce time, then multiplied by the department's hourly shop rates (source 1). It adds that formulas can grow to include part removal, and that setup is usually divided by quantity. Take cut length and pierce count from your nesting software rather than guessing.
Step 1: build your shop rate
Add up the real cost of one machine hour, then add margin. Quoting on cut time alone can bring in orders that lose money, especially when margins are thin; part costs fall into equipment, job costs such as material and gas, and labour (source 2). Our cost per hour guide sets out each formula, and the calculator does the arithmetic with your own numbers.
- Use billable hours, not clock hours. A machine idle for half a shift carries twice the depreciation per billed hour.
- Keep separate rates by gas. Assist gas is a job cost (source 2), and it differs by process, so a single blended rate can misprice both. Check your own gas use per hour.
Step 2: calculate machine time
The formula in source 1 counts pierces for a good reason: each one adds machine time. Use pierce times for your own material and thickness. Compare two parts with the same cut length:
| Part A: outline only | Part B: 40 small holes | |
|---|---|---|
| Cut length | 2.4 m | 2.4 m |
| Pierces | 1 | 41 |
| Cut time at 4 m/min | 36 s | 36 s |
| Pierce time at 1.5 s each | 1.5 s | 61.5 s |
| Total, before rapid moves | 37.5 s | 97.5 s |
Example inputs chosen by Halcyon Laser for illustration. Use your own speeds and pierce times.
On a per-metre price, both parts cost the same, yet Part B takes 2.6 times as long. That is why per-metre pricing alone loses money on hole-heavy work.
Step 3: cost the material by the sheet
Material takes the largest share of part cost in most cases (source 2), so cost it carefully. We suggest working from sheets consumed rather than part area, so that offcut waste is not absorbed silently, and rechecking steel prices on each quote. If you keep usable offcuts, agree a rule for crediting them. Tight nesting and common line cutting improve utilization, so check the nest before you quote.
Step 4: charge for setup
Estimators usually divide setup time by quantity and multiply by the hourly rate, and shorter setups make a shop more competitive on low-quantity runs (source 1). Include program preparation, sheet handling, nozzle and gas changes, first-part checks, and part sorting.
Worked example
100 parts like Part A above, in units of your own currency. All inputs are invented for illustration:
| Item | Calculation | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Machine time per part | 36 s cut + 1.5 s pierce + 22.5 s rapid and handling | 60 s |
| Machine time for job | 100 × 60 s | 100 min |
| Machine cost | 100 min × 2 units per min (shop rate 120 per hour) | 200 |
| Setup | 15 min × 2 units per min | 30 |
| Material | 4 sheets × 300 units × 1.25 markup | 1,500 |
| Job total | 200 + 30 + 1,500 | 1,730 |
| Per part | 1,730 ÷ 100 | 17.30 |
Invented inputs, not market prices. Enter your own in the calculator.
Notice that material dominates this job, as source 2 says it does in most cases. On hole-heavy work machine time takes a larger share. Decide how you apply margin, and do it consistently.
Pricing models compared
| Model | Good for | Weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Per metre of cut | Quick estimates | Ignores pierces and setup |
| Per metre plus per pierce | Everyday job-shop quotes | Ignores rapid moves |
| Machine time from the nest | Accurate quoting | Needs nesting first |
| Per kilogram | Simple plate parts | Ignores complexity |
Summary by Halcyon Laser.
Step 5: calibrate against reality
- Time a known part on the machine, and compare it with the software estimate.
- Adjust your speed, pierce and acceleration values until they match.
- Track actual against quoted time on each job for a month. The aim is to get the estimate as close to actual time as possible (source 1).
- Review your shop rate when your utilization or energy costs change.
Then use the cost per part calculator, and ask us for speed data on your materials if you are comparing machines.
Frequently asked questions
How do you calculate laser cutting cost per part?
Add machine time multiplied by your shop rate, material, setup and admin, then divide by the number of parts. Machine time is cutting, piercing and rapid moves from the nested file.
Should I price laser cutting per metre?
Only as a quick estimate. Per-metre pricing ignores pierces and setup, so hole-heavy parts lose money. Quote from machine time when you can.
How do I work out my laser shop rate?
Add labour, depreciation over billable hours, overhead, gas, electricity, consumables and maintenance per hour, then add margin. Keep separate rates for nitrogen and oxygen work.
Why does pierce time matter so much?
Every pierce adds machine time. In our example, 40 small holes made a part take 2.6 times as long at the same cut length, so per-metre pricing would miss it.
Should I charge for material by part or by sheet?
We suggest sheets consumed, so that offcut waste is not absorbed silently, and a clear rule for crediting usable offcuts. Material is usually the largest part of the cost.
Sources
- Don Clutter, “Estimating basics and quoting jobs in custom metal fabrication”, The Fabricator, 30 August 2023 — www.thefabricator.com (accessed 2026-11-01)
- Brett Thompson, Kevin Cuseo, Salay Quaranta, “How sheet metal fabrication shops can unleash laser cutting profits”, The Fabricator, 24 May 2023 (authors from the machine tool supply side) — www.thefabricator.com (accessed 2026-11-01)
More articles
- H-beam laser cutting
- Importing a fibre laser cutter into Australia
- CE marking for laser cutting machines
- Handheld laser welding vs TIG
- Importing laser cutters into Southeast Asia
- Laser rust removal vs sandblasting
- Press brake tonnage calculation
- Electric vs hydraulic press brake
- Panel bender vs press brake
- Importing a laser cutting machine into India
- Importing laser cutters into Africa
- Importing laser cutters into Latin America
- Used vs new fiber laser cutter
- Common line laser cutting
- Import duty on laser cutters from China
- How to buy a laser cutter from China
- Pulsed vs continuous laser cleaning
- Nitrogen generator vs bulk nitrogen
- Dross and burrs: troubleshooting laser cuts
- Laser cutting electrical enclosures
- Laser vs plasma bevel cutting
- Tube laser vs saw and drill
- Laser vs waterjet cutting
- Fiber laser vs plasma cutting
- Fiber vs CO₂ laser cutting